<div dir="ltr">
<p>Aberdeen are infuriated at the Scottish FA's decision to hand captain
Graeme Shinnie a four-match suspension following his red card against
Ross County last week. Shinnie was sent off for an aggressive challenge
on Jack Baldwin at Dingwall but after appealing their suspension they
received this extended punishment from them.</p><h3>PFA Scotland back Aberdeen</h3><p>PFA
Scotland have come out in support of Aberdeen FC and have called out
Graeme Shinnie's four-match ban as "ridiculously harsh and unnecessary".
Additionally, they do not believe the discretionary powers of the
disciplinary panel are appropriate and would like to see rules change as
soon as possible.<br><br>Read More: يلا شوت <a href="https://8k.yall-shoot.video/">https://8k.yall-shoot.video/</a><br><br>Shinnie
was sent off during Friday's 1-0 Premiership win against Ross County
when referee Euan Anderson issued him with the red card after VAR
intervention, prompting the Dons to appeal and an independent panel
heard their case on Tuesday.<br><br>The club had argued that Shinnie's
tackle on County defender Jack Baldwin was a direct challenge and should
have been met with immediate red card action from Anderson; however,
Anderson upheld his decision not to issue such sanction at that time.<br><br>Aberdeen
were incensed when Shinnie received a four-match suspension based on
their assessment that his appeal "lacked merit or had no chance of
succeeding". They found this action an abuse of process and delaying
tactic, and called upon Scottish FA to review this ruling using a
different panel.<br><br>Info: يلا شوت حصري <a href="https://8k.yall-shoot.video/">https://8k.yall-shoot.video/</a></p><h3>Dons boss Barry Robson has urged the Scottish FA to review the appeals panel’s verdict</h3><p>The
club are understandably dissatisfied with Shinnie's four-match ban for
his VAR challenge on Ross County defender Jack Baldwin, which they had
sought a review of following an initial three match ban following a
disciplinary panel hearing. Unfortunately, however, Shinnie appealed
against this and now his red card appeal has been upheld and an
additional game added onto his suspension.<br><br>Aberdeen have won four
of their six games under Robson since taking over from Jim Goodwin,
moving only four points behind Hearts into third place and scoring an
impressive 3-0 victory against them before the international break.
Robson has successfully established himself as an important force in
their fight for third place and European football qualification.<br><br>But
is he the right man to lead Aberdeen on its long-term journey? Will he
be able to turn around a squad which has seen 14 first-team players
leave either through loan deals or expiring contracts this summer?</p><h3>Shinnie’s ban is a slap in the face for the Dons</h3><p>On
Friday evening after being identified during a VAR review for his
involvement in Aberdeen's 1-0 win against Ross County, Shinnie was sent
off after receiving two match bans due to serious foul play and another
match due to SFA ruling that his appeal had no chance of succeeding.<br><br>The
Dons have taken exception to the Football Association (FA) decision,
calling on its governing body to revaluate their appeals process and
refer the case directly to a new disciplinary panel.<br><br>Shinnie has
been handed a four-match suspension, which they regard as being unfair
and a blow against his club. Shinnie will miss Sunday's clash against
Rangers as well as three crucial matches against fellow top six rivals
Celtic, Celtic's first three cinch teetering on top six positions and
Pittodrie are struggling in league standings compared with last season.
Additionally, this ban marks only the latest instance where such a
penalty has been issued against one player since it became available
years ago.<br><br>Info more: يلا شوت مباشر <a href="https://8k.yall-shoot.video/">https://8k.yall-shoot.video/</a></p><h3>The appeals process is flawed</h3><p>Appeal
proceedings allow parties who believe that a trial court made an
incorrect ruling to petition a higher court for review of and
modification to their decision.<br><br>Appeal processes utilizes all of
the evidence presented during trial and require parties who wish to
overturn its verdict to present written documentation called a brief
before an appeals panel of judges, which then makes their determination
on their appeals case.<br><br>Common causes for appeals include judge
errors in deciding the admissibility or inadmissibility of evidence,
mistakes in collecting such evidence, or prosecutorial misconduct such
as suppressing or failing to turn over exculpatory material.<br><br>At
oral argument, appellate counsels must respond directly and respectfully
to judges' inquiries; otherwise they risk becoming defensive and
hostile towards the panel, which could seriously hinder their efforts to
convince them.</p>
</div>